Advertisement
Original Study|Articles in Press

Vascular Invasion Predicts Recurrence in Stage IA2-IB Lung Adenocarcinoma but not Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  • Lubna Suaiti
    Affiliations
    Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Travis B. Sullivan
    Affiliations
    Department of Translational Research, Ian C. Summerhayes Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kimberly M. Rieger-Christ
    Affiliations
    Department of Translational Research, Ian C. Summerhayes Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Elliot L. Servais
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ⁎ Present address: INOVA, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Falls Church, VA
    Kei Suzuki
    Footnotes
    ⁎ Present address: INOVA, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Falls Church, VA
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Eric J. Burks
    Correspondence
    Address for correspondence: Eric J. Burks, MD, Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Boston University Mallory Pathology Associates, 670 Albany Street, Suite 304, Boston, MA 02118
    Affiliations
    Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA

    Department of Translational Research, Ian C. Summerhayes Cell and Molecular Biology Laboratory, Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, MA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    ⁎ Present address: INOVA, Department of Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Falls Church, VA
Published:December 25, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2022.12.006

      Abstract

      Background

      Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is an adverse prognostic feature in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, it is unclear if the prognostic significance applies to both lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

      Materials and Methods

      A retrospective review of H&E-stained slides from surgically resected AJCC 8th ed. stage IA2-IB LUAD (n = 344) and LUSC (n = 102) from two institutions was performed. LVI was defined as either lymphatic (LI) or vascular (VI) invasion. Outcomes were assessed by 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) estimates using the Kaplan-Meier method.

      Results

      The cohorts of LUAD and LUSC showed no significant differences in 5-year RFS (81% each), stage, age, race, or surgical procedure. The presence of LVI, VI, and LI was predictive of 5-year RFS for LUAD (LVI + 71% vs. LVI - 92%, P < 0.001; VI + 64% vs. VI - 90%, P < 0.001; LI + 75% vs. LI - 84%, P = 0.030) but not LUSC (LVI + 84% vs. LVI - 79%, P = 0.740; VI + 83% vs. VI- 80%, P = 0.852; LI + 84% vs. LI - 81%, P = 0.757). Among LUAD with LVI, VI was a stronger predictor of 5-year RFS than the remaining subset of VI-LI + tumors (64% vs. 87%, P = 004). Subset analysis of LI among LUAD stratified by VI showed no significant prognostic advantage to adding LI for risk stratification (VI-LI + 87% vs. VI-LI - 92%, P = 0.347 & VI+LI + 62% vs. VI + LI- 66%, P = 0.422). VI was present in 36% of LUAD.

      Conclusion

      Vascular invasion is a strong predictor of recurrence in stage IA2-IB LUAD but not in LUSC. Adjuvant therapy trials should be directed at this subgroup.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinical Lung Cancer
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mollberg NM
        • Bennette C
        • Howell E
        • Backhus L
        • Devine B
        • Ferguson MK.
        Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97: 965-971https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.002
        • Sereno M
        • He Z
        • Smith CR
        • et al.
        Inclusion of multiple high-risk histopathological criteria improves the prediction of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in lung adenocarcinoma.
        Histopathology. 2021; 78 (Published online February 7, 2021his.14301): 838-848https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14301
      1. Amin MB, American Joint Committee on Cancer, American Cancer Society, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. Eight edition /editor-in-chief, Mahul B. Amin, MD, FCAP; editors, Stephen B. Edge, MD, FACS [and 16 others]; Donna M. Gress, RHIT, CTR-Technical editor; Laura R. Meyer, CAPM-Managing editor. American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer; 2017.

        • Higgins KA
        • Chino JP
        • Ready N
        • et al.
        Lymphovascular invasion in non-small-cell lung cancer: implications for staging and adjuvant therapy.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7: 1141-1147https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182519a42
        • Noma D
        • Inamura K
        • Matsuura Y
        • et al.
        Prognostic effect of lymphovascular invasion on TNM staging in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.
        Clin Lung Cancer. 2018; 19: e109-e122https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.06.001
        • Kato T
        • Ishikawa K
        • Aragaki M
        • et al.
        Angiolymphatic invasion exerts a strong impact on surgical outcomes for stage I lung adenocarcinoma, but not non-adenocarcinoma.
        Lung Cancer. 2012; 77: 394-400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2012.04.002
        • Usui S
        • Minami Y
        • Shiozawa T
        • et al.
        Differences in the prognostic implications of vascular invasion between lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
        Lung Cancer. 2013; 82: 407-412https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.09.001
        • Hishida T
        • Yoshida J
        • Maeda R
        • et al.
        Prognostic impact of intratumoural microvascular invasion and microlymphatic permeation on node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer: which indicator is the stronger prognostic factor?.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 43: 772-777https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezs396
        • National Comprehensive Cancer Network
        NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
        NSCL-4, 2021 (Version 4.2021)
        • Yambayev I
        • Sullivan TB
        • Rieger-Christ KM
        • et al.
        Vascular invasion identifies the most aggressive histologic subset of stage I lung adenocarcinoma: Implications for adjuvant therapy.
        Lung Cancer. 2022; 171: 82-89https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.07.016
        • Burks EJ
        • Zhang J
        • Sullivan TB
        • et al.
        Pathologic and gene expression comparison of CT- screen detected and routinely detected stage I/0 lung adenocarcinoma in NCCN risk-matched cohorts.
        Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2021; 29100486https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100486
        • Yambayev I
        • Sullivan TB
        • Suzuki K
        • et al.
        Pulmonary adenocarcinomas of low malignant potential: proposed criteria to expand the spectrum beyond adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2021; 45: 567-576https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001618
      2. Commission on Cancer: a Quality Progrom of the American College of Surgeons. Optimal Resoruces for Cancer Care 2020 Standards. Published online April 2022. https://www.facs.org/media/whmfnppx/2020_coc_standards.pdf.

        • Wang J
        • Chen J
        • Chen X
        • Wang B
        • Li K
        • Bi J.
        Blood vessel invasion as a strong independent prognostic indicator in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        PLoS One. 2011; 6: e28844https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028844
        • Patel AJ
        • Daniel G
        • Naidu B
        • Bishay E.
        The significance of microvascular invasion after complete resection of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.
        Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016; 22: 101-105https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivv287
        • Wang S
        • Zhang B
        • Qian J
        • et al.
        Proposal on incorporating lymphovascular invasion as a T-descriptor for stage I lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2018; 125: 245-252https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.09.024
        • Samejima J
        • Yokose T
        • Ito H
        • et al.
        Prognostic significance of blood and lymphatic vessel invasion in pathological stage IA lung adenocarcinoma in the 8th edition of the TNM classification.
        Lung Cancer. 2019; 137: 144-148https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.09.022
        • Ruffini E
        • Asioli S
        • Filosso PL
        • et al.
        Significance of the presence of microscopic vascular invasion after complete resection of Stage I-II pT1-T2N0 non-small cell lung cancer and its relation with T-Size categories: did the 2009 7th edition of the TNM staging system miss something?.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2011; 6: 319-326https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182011f70
        • Shimada Y
        • Saji H
        • Kato Y
        • et al.
        The frequency and prognostic impact of pathological microscopic vascular invasion according to tumor size in non-small cell lung cancer.
        Chest. 2016; 149: 775-785https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.15-0559
        • Neri S
        • Yoshida J
        • Ishii G
        • et al.
        Prognostic impact of microscopic vessel invasion and visceral pleural invasion in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 2657 patients.
        Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 383-388https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000617
        • Kudo Y
        • Saji H
        • Shimada Y
        • et al.
        Proposal on incorporating blood vessel invasion into the T classification parts as a practical staging system for stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
        Lung Cancer. 2013; 81: 187-193https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.04.016
        • Kadota K
        • Nitadori JI
        • Woo KM
        • et al.
        Comprehensive pathological analyses in lung squamous cell carcinoma: single cell invasion, nuclear diameter, and tumor budding are independent prognostic factors for worse outcomes.
        J Thorac Oncol. 2014; 9: 1126-1139https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000253
        • Fujii T
        • Sutoh T
        • Morita H
        • et al.
        Vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, of the primary tumor is a strong prognostic factor in patients with colorectal cancer.
        Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 3147-3151
        • Fujii T
        • Yajima R
        • Hirakata T
        • et al.
        Impact of the prognostic value of vascular invasion, but not lymphatic invasion, of the primary tumor in patients with breast cancer.
        Anticancer Res. 2014; 34: 1255-1259
        • Sakuragi N
        • Takeda N
        • Hareyama H
        • et al.
        A multivariate analysis of blood vessel and lymph vessel invasion as predictors of ovarian and lymph node metastases in patients with cervical carcinoma.
        Cancer. 2000; 88: 2578-2583
        • Organisation mondiale de la santé
        • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer
        WHO Classification of Tumours of Endocrine Organs.
        4th ed. International agency for research on cancer, 2017
        • Kadota K
        • Miyai Y
        • Katsuki N
        • et al.
        A grading system combining tumor budding and nuclear diameter predicts prognosis in resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2017; 41: 750-760https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000826
        • Kadota K
        • Kushida Y
        • Katsuki N
        • et al.
        Tumor spread through air spaces is an independent predictor of recurrence-free survival in patients with resected lung squamous cell carcinoma.
        Am J Surg Pathol. 2017; 41: 1077-1086https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000872
        • Neppl C
        • Zlobec I
        • Schmid RA
        • Berezowska S.
        Validation of the international tumor budding consensus conference (ITBCC) 2016 recommendation in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung-a single-center analysis of 354 cases.
        Mod Pathol. 2020; 33: 802-811https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0413-7
        • Popper HH.
        Progression and metastasis of lung cancer.
        Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016; 35: 75-91https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-016-9618-0
        • Tilki D
        • Hu B
        • Nguyen HG
        • et al.
        Impact of synchronous metastasis distribution on cancer specific survival in renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy.
        J Urol. 2015; 193: 436-442https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.087
        • Riggi N
        • Aguet M
        • Stamenkovic I.
        Cancer metastasis: a reappraisal of its underlying mechanisms and their relevance to treatment.
        Annu Rev Pathol. 2018; 13: 117-140https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-044127
        • Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
        Comprehensive molecular profiling of lung adenocarcinoma.
        Nature. 2014; 511: 543-550https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13385
        • Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network
        Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers.
        Nature. 2012; 489: 519-525https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11404
        • Satpathy S
        • Krug K
        • Jean Beltran PM
        • et al.
        A proteogenomic portrait of lung squamous cell carcinoma.
        Cell. 2021; 184 (.e40): 4348-4371https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.016
        • Gillette MA
        • Satpathy S
        • Cao S
        • et al.
        Proteogenomic characterization reveals therapeutic vulnerabilities in lung adenocarcinoma.
        Cell. 2020; 182 (e35): 200-225https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.013
        • Khuder SA.
        Effect of cigarette smoking on major histological types of lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
        Lung Cancer. 2001; 31: 139-148https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-5002(00)00181-1
        • Khuder SA
        • Mutgi AB.
        Effect of smoking cessation on major histologic types of lung cancer.
        Chest. 2001; 120: 1577-1583https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.5.1577
        • Cerfolio RJ
        • Bryant AS
        • Scott E
        • et al.
        Women with pathologic stage I, II, and III non-small cell lung cancer have better survival than men.
        Chest. 2006; 130: 1796-1802https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.130.6.1796
        • Lee G
        • Yoon S
        • Ahn B
        • Kim HR
        • Jang SJ
        • Hwang HS.
        Blood vessel invasion predicts postoperative survival outcomes and systemic recurrence regardless of location or blood vessel type in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 7279-7290https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10122-x